以下是引用lrf在2003-4-26 23:29:37的发言:
新的记分方式实行以来,有一种6。0分泛滥的趋势,如果在这样的背景下,我觉得申雪她们的6。0是不算太过分的。T&M的分数都已经打到5。8-5。9了啊。我估计杨家声是给了她们6。0的,因为赛后有记者问他这个问题,他说总共有4个6。0分,就算他打了6。0也不是他一个人打的,这句话隐含的意思我想是他打了6。0分吧。
但是如果和以前的打分比起来,很抱歉,我只能说申雪她们这样的表现应该是得不到6。0分的,她们在技术上有所保留,第2个SBS3toe被拿掉了,整体难度不如T&M,虽然完成的非常好,但我想如果是老的打分方式的话,技术5。8表演5。9比较合适。
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-26 23:30:36编辑过]
Sorry lrf but I have to disagree that "the overall technical difficulty of S/Z's program was not equal to T/M's program". Here are some comparisons between these 2 teams:
Jumps: T/M planned SBS 3salchow, 3toe-2toe; S/Z planned SBS 2axel steps 3toe, 2axel; T/M had more difficulties here but M singled 2toe while S/Z executed 3 jumps well.
Throws and twist: they both completed throw 3salchow. throw 3loop and 3twist, but for the height & coverage, T/M just couldn't compare to S/Z.
Lifts: T/M's lifts were good but pretty easy---they only did basic lifts with T rarely changed her positions. S/Z's lifts were much more difficult with either quick revolutions or changing positions.
Step sequences: T/M's were simple and slow; S/Z's were playful with good speed.
Overall speed: Need I say more? T/M began their performance with OK speed and became slower and slower during the program while S/Z with incredible speed and maintain it until the last second of the program.
I think people shouldn't judge the difficulty of a program only by how many triple or quad jumps being planned, otherwise, Timothy Goebel would become a king on ice because he usually plans(and will continue doing it) more quads than anyone else.
Sorry again if my words are rude or off-topic.
[em23][em23][em23] |